Hierarchical network topology

ABSTRACT

A network including a hierarchical structure of nodes is described. The structure of nodes includes n layers including n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computational nodes. Each layer in the structure can include m n-L  nodes grouped into units, where m represents a number of nodes in a unit and L represents a layer in the structure, where L=0 represents a lowest layer and L=n−1 represents a highest layer. Each node in a layer other than the computational layer can include a switch node for a unit in a next lower layer. For each unit, each node can be connected to each other node by a point to point link and to a local switch node for the unit by a point to point link. Each node can be connected to each other node and to the local switch node by a local broadcast network for the unit.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation application of, and claims priorityto, pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/412,253, filed on Mar.26, 2009, entitled “Hierarchical Network Topology”. The disclosure ofthe foregoing application is incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety.

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates to electronic communications.

BACKGROUND

The arrangement of a network of nodes and links is defined by a networktopology. The network topology can determine the physical and logicalinterconnections between the network nodes, where each node has one ormore links to one or more other nodes. The physical topology of anetwork is determined by the configuration of the physical connectionsbetween the nodes. The configuration can be represented by amulti-dimensional geometric shape, for example, a ring, a star, a line,a lattice, a hypercube, or a torus. The logical topology of a network isdetermined by the flow of data between the nodes.

A network of processing nodes can be used for supercomputingapplications. For example, a large supercomputing application can bebroken into different subsets of instructions running on differentprocessing nodes of a network. In order to reduce latency and improveefficiency, distribution of traffic across the entire network andmaximized communication between nodes on a local level are preferred.

Typically, a network's addressing and routing schemes increase incomplexity with an increase in the complexity of the network topology.Complex routing tables can require significant central processing unit(CPU) time to implement. Conventional packet routing requires that apacket must be completely received at a node before the destinationaddress in the packet's header can be decoded and the packet can beforwarded, resulting in latency. Latency can also increase with acomplex addressing scheme. A complex network topology can have a highhop count to node ratio, where each hop introduces several clock cyclesof packet latency.

SUMMARY

This specification describes systems, methods, and computer programproducts related to a network topology. In general, in one aspect, theinvention features a network including a hierarchical structure ofnodes. The structure of nodes includes n layers including n−1 layers ofswitch nodes and 1 layer of computational nodes. Each layer in thestructure includes m^(n-L) nodes grouped into units, where m representsa number of nodes in a unit and is an integer greater than 1. Lrepresents a layer in the structure and is an integer with L=0representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layer. Eachnode in a layer other than the computational layer includes a switchnode for a unit in a next lower layer in the structure. For each unit,each node in the unit is connected to each other node in the unit by apoint to point link, each node in the unit is connected to a localswitch node for the unit by a point to point link, and each node in theunit is connected to each other node in the unit and to the local switchnode by a local broadcast network for the unit.

Implementations of the network can include one or more of the followingfeatures. Each computational node can include a processing elementoperable to perform instructions of one or more applications. The lowestlayer in the structure can be the layer of computational nodes and caninclude m^(n) computational nodes. Each node in the unit can beconnected to each other node in the unit and to the local switch node byan Ethernet network. Each computational node can include a processingelement, a controller, and memory. Each computational node can includecommunication hardware implemented as a field programmable gate array.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a networkincluding a hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. The nlayers include n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computationalnodes. Each layer in the structure includes one or more units of nodes,where L represents a layer in the structure and is an integer with L=0representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layer and anumber of nodes in a unit is greater than 1. Each node in a layer otherthan the computational layer includes a switch node for a unit in a nextlower layer in the structure. For each unit, each node in the unit isconnected to each other node in the unit by a point to point link, eachnode in the unit is connected to a local switch node for the unit by apoint to point link, and each node in the unit is connected to eachother node in the unit and to the local switch node by a local broadcastnetwork for the unit.

Implementations of the network can include one or more of the followingfeatures. One or more point to point links included in one or more unitscan be deactivated. Each unit of a layer in the structure can have thesame number of nodes. Each unit of each layer in the structure can havethe same number of nodes. Each unit can include a local,three-dimensional network topology represented by a 2×2×2 cube including8 nodes. Each computational node can include a processing elementoperable to perform instructions of one or more applications.

The lowest layer in the structure can be the layer of computationalnodes. Each node in the unit can be connected to each other node in theunit and to the local switch node by an Ethernet network. Eachcomputational node can include a processing element, a controller, andmemory. Each computational node can include communication hardwareimplemented as a field programmable gate array.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a networked deviceincluding a hierarchical structure of nodes and a processor. Thehierarchical structure of nodes includes n layers including n−1 layersof switch nodes and 1 layer of computational nodes. L represents a layerin the hierarchical structure and is an integer with L=0 representing alowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layer. The processor isconfigured for processing n groups of bits received in a packet, whereeach computational node is fully addressed by the n groups of bits andeach switch node of a layer L is fully addressed by n−L groups of mostsignificant bits.

Implementations of the networked device can include one or more of thefollowing features. Each of the n groups of bits can include the samenumber of bits. In some implementations, each layer includes one or moreunits of nodes, each unit includes a local 2×2×2 cubic network with twonodes per side in each of three dimensions x, y and z, and each node islogically located within the cubic network using a three-dimensionaladdress {x,y,z} ranging from {0,0,0} to {1,1,1}, where thethree-dimensional address logically locating each node within the cubicnetwork comprises one of the n groups of bits. In some implementations,each layer includes one or more units of nodes, each unit includes alocal 2×4×4 network with two nodes per side in an x dimension and fournodes per side in each of an y and z dimension, and each node islogically located within the local network using a three-dimensionaladdress {x,y1,y2,z1,z2} ranging from {0,0,0,0,0} to {1,1,1,1,1}, wherethe three-dimensional address logically locating each node within thelocal network comprises one of the n groups of bits.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method ofrouting packets in a network. The network has a topology characterizedby a hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. The n layersinclude n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computational nodes,where L represents a layer in the structure and is an integer with L=0representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layer. Apacket is received at a switch node of layer L of the structure. Thepacket includes a header with a first address including n groups ofbits. The switch node has a second address including n−L groups of bits.The packet is forwarded to a node in either the layer L, the layer L+1,or the layer L−1 based on a comparison of the first address and thesecond address.

In some implementations, if the n−L groups of most significant bits ofthe first address match the n−L groups of bits of the second address,then the message can be forwarded on a point to point link to a node oflayer L−1 of the structure fully addressed by the n−L+1 groups of mostsignificant bits of the first address. If the n−L groups do not matchbut the n−L−1 groups of most significant bits of the first address domatch the n−L−1 groups of most significant bits of the second address,then the message can be forwarded on a point to point link to a switchnode of layer L of the structure fully addressed by the n−L groups ofmost significant bits of the first address. If the n−L−1 groups of mostsignificant bits of the first address do not match the n−L−1 groups ofmost significant bits of the second address, then the message can beforwarded on a point to point link to a switch node of layer L+1 of thestructure fully addressed by the n−L−1 groups of most significant bitsof the second address.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method ofrouting packets in a network, the network having a topologycharacterized by a hierarchical structure of nodes having n layers. Then layers include n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computationalnodes, where L represents a layer in the structure and is an integerwith L=0 representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highestlayer. A packet can be transmitted from a computational node of layer Lto either a second computational node of layer L or to a switch node oflayer L+1. The packet includes a header with a first address including ngroups of bits, and the computational node has a second addressincluding n groups of bits. The packet can be transmitted based on acomparison of the first and the second address.

In some implementations, if n−1 groups of most significant bits of thefirst address match n−1 groups of most significant bits of the secondaddress, then the message can be forwarded on a point to point link tothe second computational node of layer L of the structure fullyaddressed by the n groups of bits of the first address. If the n−1groups do not match, then the message can be forwarded on a point topoint link to the switch node of layer L+1 of the structure fullyaddressed by the n−1 groups of most significant bits of the secondaddress.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a method ofrouting a packet in a network, the network having a topologycharacterized by a hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. Lrepresents a layer in the structure and is an integer with L=0representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layer. Themethod includes receiving at least a packet header of a packet at afirst node and based on the packet header, determining whether totransmit the packet to a second node in either layer L, layer L+1, orlayer L−1. The packet is transmitted to the second node as soon as thepacket is received at the first node without waiting to receive anentire packet and without copying the packet prior to transmission fromthe first node.

Implementations of the method can include one or more of the followingfeatures. The n layers can include n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1layer of computational nodes. Each layer in the structure can includenodes grouped into units having more than one node per unit, and eachnode in a layer other than the computational layer can include a switchnode for a unit in a next lower layer in the structure. The first nodecan be a switch node and transmitting a packet to a second node in thelayer L can include transmitting the packet to the second node in thesame unit as the first node by a point to point link. Transmitting apacket to a second node in the layer L+1 or the layer L−1 can includetransmitting the packet to the second node in a different unit than thefirst node by a point to point link.

In general, in another aspect, the invention features a system includinga hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. The n layersinclude n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computational nodes,where each layer in the hierarchical structure includes one or moreunits of nodes. L represents a layer in the structure and is an integerwith L=0 representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highestlayer and a number of nodes in a unit is greater than 1. The switchnodes are configured to: receive at least a packet header of a packet;based on the packet header, determine whether to transmit the packet toa second node in either layer L, layer L+1, or layer L−1; and transmitone or more packets forming a message to the second node as soon as thepackets are received at the switch node without waiting to receive anentire packet and without copying the packet prior to transmission fromthe switch node.

Implementations of the system can include one or more of the followingfeatures. The computational nodes can each include at least oneprocessor, communication hardware, and a memory. The at least oneprocessor can include an application processor and an operating systemprocessor. The communication hardware can include a field-programmablegate array (FPGA). The communication hardware can be configured tomonitor traffic to the computational node. The communication hardwarecan be configured to direct a message received at the computational nodeto the processor, and receive a message from the processor fortransmission to a different node. Each node in a layer other than thecomputational layer can include a switch node for a unit in a next lowerlayer in the structure. For each unit, each node in the unit can beconnected to each other node in the unit by a point to point link, eachnode in the unit can be connected to a local switch node for the unit bya point to point link, and each node in the unit can be connected toeach other node in the unit and to the local switch node by a localbroadcast network for the unit. The switch nodes can each include aprocessor and communication hardware.

Implementations can realize one or more of the following advantages. Ahierarchical three-dimensional (3-D) network topology allows for asimple addressing scheme, where routing is intrinsically linked to thenetwork topology, promoting fast message delivery with reduced latency.The network topology also offers the benefit of tight local groups ofprocessing nodes, facilitating distribution of traffic on a local level.The network topology yields a low hop count to node ratio forpoint-to-point and multicast communications. The protocol is streamed,which allows a switch node to begin forwarding a message before thepacket has been completely received at the switch node, furtherminimizing latency. Multicast and broadcast communications only use thenetwork layers necessary for packet delivery without utilizing theentire network.

The details of one or more embodiments of the invention are set forth inthe accompanying drawings and the description below. Other features,objects, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from thedescription and drawings, and from the claims.

DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 illustrates an example network having a network topology.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example hierarchical tree network.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example hierarchical 3-D network.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example addressing scheme for the hierarchicaltree network of FIG. 2.

FIG. 5 illustrates example addressing for a 2×2×2 unit of a hierarchical3-D network.

FIG. 6 illustrates example addressing for a 2×4×4 unit of a hierarchical3-D network.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example network having a network topology.

FIG. 8 illustrates an example hierarchical tree network.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example addressing scheme for the hierarchicaltree network of FIG. 8.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart of an example process for routing a messagereceived at a switch node in the hierarchical tree network of FIG. 2using the addressing scheme of FIG. 4.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart of an example process for routing a messageoriginating from a computational node in the hierarchical tree networkof FIG. 2 using the addressing scheme of FIG. 4.

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of an example computer system.

Like reference symbols in the various drawings indicate like elements.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

A network having a network topology including a hierarchical structureof nodes is described. In some implementations, the hierarchicalstructure can include n layers: n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layerof computational nodes. Each layer in the structure can include one ormore units, a unit including a set of nodes. Each unit within a layercan have the same number of nodes or a different number of nodes asunits in different layers. Each node in a layer, other than thecomputational layer, can include a switch node for a unit in a nextlower layer in the structure. Each node in the unit can be connected toeach other node in the unit and to a local switch node for the unit by apoint to point link. Each node in the unit can also be connected to eachother node in the unit and to the local switch node by a local broadcastnetwork for the unit.

The network topology is a hybrid of a hierarchical (e.g., tree) networktopology and a fully connected network topology. In someimplementations, each unit of a layer in the hierarchical structure haseight fully connected nodes in a 2×2×2 arrangement, which can bevisualized as a cubic network with two nodes per side in each of threedimensions. Messages can be routed through this 3-D network using asimple addressing scheme. This 3-D network local to a unit can berepeated hierarchically through the layers of the structure to retainthe same attributes throughout the entire network. This arrangementallows a complex network to be realized without the need for complexrouting tables or other complex schemes that take significant CPU timeto implement.

An example of a network topology 100 is illustrated in FIG. 1. Inparticular, FIG. 1 illustrates a unit 102 of computational nodes 104 atthe lowest layer in the hierarchical structure of the network topology100. The local network topology of the unit 102 is formed around eightcomputational nodes 104, known as leaf nodes.

In some implementations, each computational node 104 includes aprocessing element operable to perform instructions of one or moreapplications. In some implementations, different computational nodes 104include different processing elements. In some implementations, somecomputational nodes 104 include different or unique processing elements,while the remaining computational nodes 104 include uniform processingelements. In some implementations, one or more switch nodes 108 includea processing element, for example, for traffic management.

Each computational node 104 is connected to each other computationalnode 104 of the unit 102 by a point to point link 106 (e.g., a highspeed node to node link). Each computational node 104 is connected to aswitch node 108 of a unit in the next higher layer by a point to pointlink 110 (e.g., a high speed switch to node link). Each computationalnode 104 is also connected to each other computational node 104 of theunit 102 and the switch node 108 by a local broadcast network 112 forthe unit 102. The switch node 108 can bridge the local broadcast network112 for the unit 102 to other local broadcast networks of other units ofthe hierarchical structure of the network topology 100. The localbroadcast network 112 allows communication with all the computationalnodes 104 of the unit 102 or a subset of the computational nodes 104 ofthe unit 102.

Operating system (OS) software can be distributed throughout the networkat each node and switch. The OS software can include local services aswell as system wide supervisory functions. In some implementations, eachcomputational node 104 is also connected to each other computationalnode 104 of the unit 102 and the switch node 108 by an Ethernet network114. The Ethernet network 114 can be used for system administrationfunctions (e.g., low data rate system maintenance and monitoring) thatare independent of application software. Examples of communication onthe Ethernet network 114 include logging information about CPUtemperatures, time-synching, and transmission control protocol (TCP). Insome implementations, if the network topology 100 does not include anEthernet network 114, the system administration messages can betransported on the point to point links (e.g., node to node links andswitch to node links).

In some implementations, each unit of each layer in the hierarchicalstructure of the network topology 100 has the same node arrangement.However, for layers above the lowest layer, each node of a unit is aswitch node for a unit in the layer below. For example, the switch node108 is a node of a unit in the second lowest layer (i.e., layer L=1) andacts as a switch for the unit 102 in the lowest layer (i.e., layer L=0).In some implementations, the switch nodes of a unit in a layer are fullyconnected by point to point (i.e., switch to switch) links. For example,the switch node 108 of a unit in the second lowest layer is connected toall other switch nodes in the same unit and to a switch node of a unitin the layer above by the switch to switch links 116. As mentionedabove, in other implementations, the number of nodes in a unit can varyacross layers.

A multi-dimensional, hierarchically scalable network can use the examplenetwork topology 100 of FIG. 1. In implementations where each unit ofeach layer in the hierarchical structure has a local, 3-D networktopology of a 2×2×2 cube of eight nodes, each node can be logicallylocated within the octet using a 3-D address from {0,0,0} to {1,1,1}.That is, each node is addressed within a unit using three bits. Thecomplete address of a computational node of the lowest layer of thehierarchical structure is a binary number divided into groups of threebits. The group of three least significant bits (LSB) of the binarynumber identifies a particular computational node (i.e., leaf node) of aunit of the lowest layer, while each group of more significant threebits corresponds to a particular switch node of a unit of a higher layerin the hierarchical structure. Addressing of the multi-dimensional,hierarchically scalable network is described in more detail with respectto FIGS. 4-5 below.

The multi-dimensional hierarchical network described can be scaled up,as needed, with successively larger hierarchical layers to accommodatesupercomputing applications. The multi-dimensional hierarchical networkprovides efficient and flexible high speed communications needed insuper-scale computing. For example, the use of dedicated point to pointcommunications within the local network topology of a unit maximizeslocal throughput. The local broadcast network for a unit allows groupcommunications independent of the point to point links. Each switch nodeis part of another unit with point to point and broadcast links,offering point to point, multicast, and broadcast communicationsthroughout the flexible network.

The multi-dimensional hierarchical network can be designed to removesystem overhead in order to minimize latency and maximize performanceagainst cost and power consumption. For example, a system implementingthe multi-dimensional hierarchical network can provide a softwareapplication with an industry-standard application programming interface(API) for message passing, implemented with minimal software overhead.

FIG. 2 illustrates an example hierarchical tree network 200. The examplehierarchical tree network 200 illustrates one way of viewing thehierarchical structure of the example network topology 100 of FIG. 1.

The example hierarchical tree network 200 includes n layers, includingn−1 layers of switch nodes 108 and 1 layer of computational nodes 104,where n=10. As illustrated, the layer 210 of computational nodes 104 isthe lowest layer (i.e., layer L=0). The layers 210 of switch nodes 108are the upper n−1=9 layers (i.e., layers L=1, 2, . . . , 9). Each layerL includes m^(n-L) nodes, where m represents the number of nodes in aunit and is an integer greater than 1. In the example of FIG. 2, thenumber of nodes, m, in a unit is eight. Thus, each unit of the lowestlayer includes eight computational nodes 104, and each unit of a higherlayer includes eight switch nodes 108. Each switch node 108 acts as aswitch for the nodes of a unit in a next lower layer 210. For thisexample where n=10 and m=8, the lowest layer (i.e., layer L=0) includes8¹⁰⁻⁰=1,073,741,824 computational nodes 104. Each computational node 104can include a processing element operable to perform instructions of oneor more software applications.

For clarity of FIG. 2, only a portion of the switch to node links 110and the switch to switch links 116 are illustrated. The node to nodelinks 106 between the computational nodes 104 of a unit of the lowestlayer and the switch to switch links 116 between the switch nodes 108 ofa unit of the higher layers are not illustrated. Other than the layerL=1, only one sub-tree from each layer 210 of switch nodes 108 isillustrated. The broadcast network 112 is also not illustrated.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example hierarchical 3-D network 300. The examplehierarchical 3-D network 300 illustrates another way of viewing thehierarchical structure of the example network topology 100 of FIG. 1.FIG. 3 illustrates three layers 310-312 of nodes including switch nodes(e.g., switch nodes 108) in layers 310, 311 and computational nodes(e.g., computational nodes 104) in layer 312 of the example hierarchical3-D network 300. The example hierarchical 3-D network 300 can includeadditional layers (not shown). For clarity of FIG. 3, only a portion ofeach of the layers 311 and 312 are illustrated.

In this implementation, each unit 320 of a layer in the hierarchical 3-Dnetwork 300 has eight fully connected nodes in a 2×2×2 arrangement as acubic network with two nodes per side in each of three dimensions. Inthe upper two layers 310 and 311, each node (i.e., switch node 108) actsas a switch for the nodes of a unit 320 in a next lower layer i.e.,layers 311 and 312, respectively. Each switch node 108 of a unit 320 ofa layer is linked to each other switch node 108 of the same unit 320 inthe same layer and to each node of a unit 320 in the next lower layer.For example, the unit 320 in the layer 310 includes eight switch nodes322 a-h. Each of the switch nodes 322 a-h functions as a switch node fora unit included in the next layer down, i.e., layer 311. In thisexample, switch node 322 h functions as a switch node for the unit 320in layer 311 including the eight nodes 324 a-h. The eight nodes 324 a-hare also switch nodes, where each of the nodes 324 a-h functions as aswitch node for a unit included in the next layer down, i.e., layer 312.For example, switch node 324 h functions as a switch node for the unit320 included in the layer 312 having eight nodes 326 a-h. In thisexample, the eight nodes 326 a-h are computational nodes.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example addressing scheme 400 for the hierarchicaltree network 200 of FIG. 2, which addressing scheme can be implementedby a networked device including a processor. The example addressingscheme 400 provides a destination address for a message as a 30-bitaddress 405 (i.e., from bit 0 to bit 29) in a four-byte address word.The 30-bit address 405 is divided into ten groups 410 of three bits,i.e., bit fields Add0, Add1, . . . , Add9. The two most significant bits(MSB) (i.e., bits 30 and 31) of the four-byte address word can be setaside as a reserved bit field 420 for future use.

The group 410 of three least significant bits (LSB) of the 30-bitaddress 405 (i.e., bit field Add0) identifies a particular computationalnode 104 of a unit of the lowest layer of the hierarchical tree network200, while each group 410 of more significant bits (i.e., bit fieldsAdd1 to Add9) corresponds to a particular switch node 108 of a unit of aconsecutively higher layer in the hierarchical structure. That is, theeight computational nodes 104 of a unit of the lowest layer L=0 areaddressed by Add0, and the switch nodes 108 at layers L=1 to L=9 areaddressed by Add1 to Add9, respectively.

Each computational node 104 is fully addressed by the complete 30-bitaddress 405 (i.e., by bit fields Add0 to Add9). Each switch node 108 ofa given layer is fully addressed by a partial address using bit fieldgroups 410 from the given layer to the group 410 of MSB. For example, aswitch node 108 of layer L=3 is fully addressed by bit fields Add3 toAdd9.

In some implementations, each message packet includes a header with anumber of fields, including, for example, the destination address, thesize of the message packet, a checksum of the message packet, and asource address. The header can be prepended to the data in part by theoperating system (OS) software and the hardware as the data istransmitted. The packet header provides all the data needed to deliverthe packet intact. The checksum can be added by the OS at sending toprovide a simple check that the entire packet is valid. A check can bemade at the destination. In one example, the checksum used is a onescompliment sum as used in Internet Protocol (RFC971).

The reserved bit field 420 can be used for address range expansion,allowing a flexible number of address words while retaining the sameoverall structure for the addressing scheme 400. For example, the MSB(i.e., bit 31) of a four-byte address word can be a continuation bitindicating if the destination address is completely specified by thefour-byte address word or if the destination address in the four-byteaddress word is a high portion of a multi-word destination address.Subsequent address words can also use the MSB to indicate anotherportion of the multi-word destination address.

The second MSB (i.e., bit 30) of the four-byte address word can indicateif the destination address is a point to point protocol address, or ifthe destination address specifies a descriptor for a group ofdestinations (e.g., multiple nodes). If the second MSB indicates thatthe destination address specifies a group descriptor, the bits of thedestination address can include an identifier for the group ofdestinations. In one implementation, the group descriptor can be used bya node's communication hardware to assign links for transmitting themessage, as described below.

Routing of a message using the example addressing scheme 400 does notrequire a complex routing scheme, e.g., complex routing tables. For asingle destination message sent from a source computational node 104 ofa unit of the lowest layer, the link on which to send the message packetis either to one of the other seven peer computational nodes 104 of thesame unit or to the switch node 108 to which the source computationalnode 104 is connected (e.g., by a switch to node link 110 of FIG. 1).The message is sent on a link (e.g., a node to node link 106 of FIG. 1)to one of the other seven peer computational nodes 104 if the groups 410of bit fields Add1 to Add9 are equal as between the address of thesource computational node 104 and the address of the destinationcomputational node 104 specified in the header of the message packet.The message is sent on a link to the connected switch node 108 of thesecond layer if the groups 410 of bit fields Add1 to Add9 are not equalas between the address of the source computational node 104 and theaddress of the destination computational node 104.

For message routing at a switch node 108, a similar comparison of theaddress bit fields is performed. For example, for a given switch node108 of a unit of a given layer L, the link on which to send a singledestination message packet is either to the switch node 108 of layer L+1to which the given switch node 108 is connected (e.g., by a switch toswitch link 116 of FIG. 1), to one of the other seven peer switch nodes108 of the same unit (e.g., by a switch to switch link 116 of FIG. 1),or to one of the eight nodes of layer L−1 to which the given switch node108 is connected. The link on which the message packet is sent isdetermined by comparing the bit range Add(L) to Add9 of the address ofthe given switch node 108 to the corresponding bit ranges of the addressof the destination node. Routing of a message is further described belowwith respect to FIGS. 10-11.

The example addressing scheme 400 for the hierarchical tree network 200provides a low hop count to node ratio for point to point or multicast.In this example network 200, a message transmitted from any firstcomputational node 104 of a unit can reach any second computational node104 of a different unit in a maximum of 18 hops. For example, from thefirst computational node 104 of a first unit at layer L=0, a messagetakes nine hops to reach the highest layer (i.e., layer L=9) of thehierarchical structure and takes another nine hops to reach the lowestlayer (i.e., layer L=0) to be routed to a second computational node 104of a second unit of the lowest layer. However, if the message does notneed to be routed to the highest layer because one or more of the groups410 of more significant bits are common between the source computationalnode 104 and the destination computational node 104, the message can berouted in fewer than the maximum 18 hops.

In some implementations, the four-byte address word is the first portionof the message packet header received. The four-byte address word can befollowed by the packet size field, which indicates how much data totransmit. This configuration facilitates a streamed link protocol,allowing any switch node 108 to begin forwarding a message once thefour-byte address word is received and before the message packet hasbeen completely received at the switch node 108, minimizing latencyunless the message packet needs to be buffered due to congestion. For alatency of two cycles per hop, the maximum latency from the start ofsending a message from a source computational node 104 to the start ofreceiving the message at a destination computational node 104 is 36cycles, if the protocol is streamed and the message packet does not needto be buffered.

FIG. 5 illustrates example addressing 500 for a 2×2×2 unit of ahierarchical 3-D network, for example the example hierarchical 3-Dnetwork 300 of FIG. 3. The unit has eight fully connected nodes in a2×2×2 arrangement as a cubic network with two nodes per side in each ofthree dimensions: X, Y, and Z. Each node can be logically located withinthe cubic network using a 3-D address {X, Y, Z} from {0,0,0} to {1,1,1}.That is, each node is addressed within the unit using three bits, eachbit for each of the three dimensions.

The hierarchical tree network 200 of FIG. 2 illustrates the ease ofreaching any node from any other node by simply traversing the treenetwork vertically between layers and horizontally within units. Thehierarchical 3-D network 300 of FIG. 3 illustrates the complexity andthe flexibility attainable by the network. A system implementing ahierarchical 3-D network topology can be represented by both thehierarchical tree network 200 and the hierarchical 3-D network 300 andcan use the addressing scheme 400 of FIG. 4, where addressing of each2×2×2 unit is through the addressing 500 of FIG. 5. From thehierarchical tree network 200 view, a 3-bit address field can identifyone of eight nodes of a unit. From the hierarchical 3-D network 300view, a 3-bit address field can be used as an index on the 3-D Cartesiancoordinates of a local cubic network.

FIG. 6 illustrates example addressing scheme 600 for a 2×4×4 unit of ahierarchical 3-D network. The unit has 32 fully connected nodes (not allshown) in a 2×4×4 arrangement as a 3-D network with two nodes per sidein the X dimension and four nodes per side in each of the Y and Zdimensions. Each node can be logically located within the local networkusing a 3-D address {X, Y1, Y2, Z1, Z2} from {0,0,0,0,0} to {1,1,1,1,1}.That is, each node is addressed within the unit using five bits: one bitfor the X dimension, two bits for the Y dimension, and two bits for theZ dimension. Although FIGS. 5 and 6 illustrate two addressing examples(i.e., 2×2×2 and 2×4×4 arrangements) for units of hierarchical 3-Dnetworks, different addressing for other 3-D node arrangements can beimplemented in hierarchical 3-D network topologies.

In some implementations, one or more point to point links between nodescan be deactivated. For example, on a system implementing a hierarchical3-D network with the example addressing 600 for 2×4×4 units of thehierarchical network, if an application running on the system requiresonly 18 nodes per unit, the 2×4×4 units can be connected as 2×3×3 units,with certain logical links between nodes in the Y and Z dimensionsdeactivated.

In some implementations, units of all layers of the hierarchical networkhave the same, local 3-D network topology. In these implementations,each of the groups of address bits identifying a node in a unit of alayer has the same number of bits.

In some implementations, units of different layers of the hierarchicalnetwork can have different, local 3-D network topology. In theseimplementations, the groups of address bits identifying nodes in unitsof different layers can have different numbers of bits. For example, theunits of computational nodes of the lowest layer can have a local 2×4×4network topology, where each computational node of a unit is identifiedby a 5-bit address field (e.g., {X, Y1, Y2, Z1, Z2}), while the units ofswitch nodes of the higher layers can have a local 2×2×2 networktopology, where each switch node of a unit is identified by a 3-bitaddress field (e.g., {X, Y, Z}).

Hierarchical network topologies can be implemented as networks ofdimensions higher than three. For example, a system can implement ahierarchical four-dimensional (4-D) network topology. FIG. 7 illustratesan example network topology 700, which can have four dimensions.

FIG. 7 illustrates a unit 702 of computational nodes 704 at the lowestlayer in a hierarchical structure of a network topology 700. The localnetwork topology of the unit 702 is formed around sixteen computationalnodes 704. In one example, the local network topology of the unit 702can be a 2×2×2×2 network topology.

Each computational node 704 is connected to each other computationalnode 704 of the unit 702 by a point to point link 706. Eachcomputational node 704 is connected to a switch node 708 of a unit inthe next higher layer by a point to point link 710. Each computationalnode 704 is also connected to each other computational node 704 of theunit 702 and the switch node 708 by a local broadcast network 712 forthe unit 702. The switch node 708 can bridge the local broadcast network712 for the unit 702 to other local broadcast networks of other units ofthe hierarchical structure of the network topology 700. In someimplementations, each computational node 704 is also connected to eachother computational node 704 of the unit 702 and the switch node 708 byan Ethernet network (not shown).

FIG. 8 illustrates an example hierarchical tree network 800. The examplehierarchical tree network 800 illustrates one way of viewing thehierarchical structure of the example network topology 700 of FIG. 7. Inone example, the local network topology of each unit in the examplehierarchical tree network 800 can be a 2×2×2×2 network topology.

The example hierarchical tree network 800 includes one layer of switchnodes 708 and one layer of computational nodes 704. The layer ofcomputational nodes 704 is the lower layer, while the layer of switchnodes 708 is the higher layer. There are sixteen nodes in each unit of alayer in the example hierarchical tree network 800. Each switch node 708acts as a switch for the nodes of a unit in the lower layer. For thisexample, the lower layer includes 16²=256 computational nodes 704.

For clarity of FIG. 8, only two sub-trees from the higher layer ofswitch nodes 708 are illustrated. Hence, only a portion of the switch tonode links 710 are illustrated. Additionally, the node to node linksbetween the computational nodes 704 of a unit of the lower layer and theswitch to switch links between the switch nodes 708 of the unit of thehigher layer are not illustrated.

FIG. 9 illustrates an example addressing scheme 900 for the hierarchicaltree network 800 of FIG. 8. The example addressing scheme 900 provides adestination address for a message as an 8-bit address 905 (i.e., frombit 0 to bit 7) in one byte. The 8-bit address 905 is divided into twogroups 910 of four bits, i.e., bit fields Add0 and Add1. If each unit ofthe hierarchical tree network 800 has a local, 2×2×2×2 network topology,each node is addressed within a unit using one bit for each of fourdimensions. In some implementations, an addressing scheme for thehierarchical tree network 800 of FIG. 8 can use more than one byte, withspare bits (not shown) reserved for future use.

The group 910 of four LSB of the 8-bit address 905 (i.e., bit fieldAdd0) identifies a particular computational node 704 of a unit of thelower layer of the hierarchical tree network 800, while the group 910 offour MSB (i.e., bit field Add1) corresponds to a particular switch node708 of the higher layer in the hierarchical structure. Eachcomputational node 704 is fully addressed by the complete 8-bit address905 (i.e., by bit fields Add0 and Add1). Each switch node 708 of thehigher layer is fully addressed by a partial address using the bit fieldgroup 910 of MSB (i.e., bit field Add1). For example, the switch nodes810 and 820 of FIG. 8 are fully addressed by Add1={0,0,0,0} andAdd1=(1,1,1,1}, respectively. The computational node 825 of FIG. 8 isconnected by a point to point link to the switch node 820 and is fullyaddressed by {Add1, Add0}={1,1,1,1,0,0,0,1}.

FIG. 10 is a flow chart of an example process 1000 for routing a messagereceived at a switch node in the hierarchical tree network 200 of FIG. 2using the addressing scheme 400 of FIG. 4. For convenience, the exampleprocess 1000 is described with reference to FIGS. 1-2 and 4 and a systemthat performs the process 1000.

The example process 1000 is for an addressing system of a networktopology (e.g., the network topology 100 of FIG. 1). The networktopology has a hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. The nlayers include n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computationalnodes. The layer in the structure is represented by “L”, which is aninteger where L=0 represents the lowest layer and L=n−1 represents thehighest layer. For a message received at a switch node of a given unitin layer L of the structure, the example process 1000 routes the messageeither up a layer in the structure (i.e., to the switch node in thelayer L+1 directly connected to the switch nodes of the given unit),down a layer in the structure (i.e., to one of the nodes in the layerL−1 directly connected to the switch node), or to one of the other peerswitch nodes of the given unit.

The system receives a message at a switch node of layer L of thestructure, where the message includes a header with a first address(e.g., a destination address) including n groups of bits, and the switchnode has a second address including n−L groups of bits (step 1010). Forexample, the addressing system can be the example addressing scheme 400of FIG. 4, where the 30-bit address 405 for each computational nodeincludes ten groups 410 of bits.

The system determines if the n−L groups of MSB of the first addressmatch the n−L groups of bits of the second address (decision 1020). Forexample, the system can determine if the groups of bits match byapplying bit masks to the respective groups of bits of the first andsecond addresses.

If the system determines that the n−L groups match (“yes” branch ofdecision 1020), the system forwards the message on a point to point linkto a node of layer L−1 of the structure that is fully addressed by then−L+1 groups of MSB of the first address (step 1030). For example, thesystem can forward the message down one level of the hierarchical treenetwork 200 to a switch node on a switch to switch link (e.g., a switchto switch link 116 of FIGS. 1-2) or to a computational node on a switchto node link (e.g., a switch to node link 110 of FIGS. 1-2).

The system determines if the node receiving the message (i.e., the nodeof layer L−1 that is fully addressed by the n−L+1 groups of MSB of thefirst address) is the destination node (decision 1070). For example, thesystem can determine if the node receiving the message is acomputational node fully addressed by all the bits of the first address.If the system determines that the node receiving the message is thedestination node (“yes” branch of decision 1070), the example process1000 ends. If the system determines that the node receiving the messageis not the destination node (“no” branch of decision 1070), the exampleprocess 1000 repeats from step 1010, where the message is received atthe node of layer L−1.

If the system determines that the n−L groups do not match (“no” branchof decision 1020), the system determines if the n−L−1 groups of MSB ofthe first address match the n−L−1 groups of MSB of the second address(decision 1040). If the system determines that the n−L−1 groups match(“yes” branch of decision 1040), the system forwards the message on apoint to point link to a switch node of layer L of the structure that isfully addressed by the n−L groups of MSB of the first address (step1050). For example, the system can forward the message horizontallywithin the unit of the layer L of the hierarchical tree network 200 on aswitch to switch link (e.g., a switch to switch link 116 of FIGS. 1-2)to one of the peer switch nodes of the same unit. The example process1000 repeats from step 1010, where the message is received at the nodeof layer L.

If the system determines that the n−L−1 groups do not match (“no” branchof decision 1040), the system forwards the message on a point to pointlink to a switch node of layer L+1 of the structure that is fullyaddressed by the n−L−1 groups of MSB of the second address (step 1060).For example, the system can forward the message up one level of thehierarchical tree network 200 on a switch to switch link (e.g., a switchto switch link 116 of FIGS. 1-2) to the only switch node of layer L+1that is directly connected to the switch nodes of the unit. The exampleprocess 1000 repeats from step 1010, where the message is received atthe node of layer L+1.

FIG. 11 is a flow chart of an example process 1100 for routing a messageoriginating from a computational node in the hierarchical tree network200 of FIG. 2 using the addressing scheme 400 of FIG. 4 to a destinationnode. For convenience, the example process 1100 is described withreference to FIGS. 1-2 and 4 and a system that performs the process1100.

The example process 1100 is for an addressing system of a networktopology (e.g., the network topology 100 of FIG. 1). The networktopology has a hierarchical structure of nodes including n layers. The nlayers include n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1 layer of computationalnodes. The layer in the structure is represented by “L”, which is aninteger where L=0 represents the lowest layer and L=n−1 represents thehighest layer. For a message originating from a computational node of agiven unit in layer L of the structure, the example process 1100 routesthe message either up a layer in the structure (i.e., to the switch nodein the layer L+1 directly connected to the computational nodes of thegiven unit) or to one of the other peer computational nodes of the givenunit.

The message is being routed from a computational node of layer L of thestructure. The message includes a header with a first address (e.g., adestination address) including n groups of bits, and the computationalnode has a second address (e.g., a source address) including n groups ofbits. For example, the addressing system can be the example addressingscheme 400 of FIG. 4, where the 30-bit address 405 for eachcomputational node includes ten groups 410 of bits.

The system determines if the n−1 groups of MSB of the first addressmatch the n−1 groups of MSB of the second address (decision 1120). Thischeck determines if the destination node is in the given unit. If thesystem determines that the n−1 groups match (“yes” branch of decision1120), indicating that the destination node is in the given unit, thesystem forwards the message on a point to point link to a computationalnode of layer L of the structure that is fully addressed by the n groupsof bits of the first address (step 1130). For example, the system canforward the message horizontally within the unit of the layer L of thehierarchical tree network 200 on a node to node link (e.g., a node tonode link 106 of FIG. 1) to one of the peer computational nodes of thesame unit. The computational node of layer L that receives the forwardedmessage is the destination node specified by the first address.Following step 1130, the example process 1100 ends.

If the system determines that the n−1 groups do not match (“no” branchof decision 1120), indicating that the destination node is in adifferent unit, the system forwards the message on a point to point linkto a switch node of layer L+1 of the structure that is fully addressedby the n−1 groups of MSB of the second address (step 1140). For example,the system can forward the message up one level of the hierarchical treenetwork 200 on a switch to node link (e.g., a switch to node link 110 ofFIGS. 1-2) to the only switch node of layer L+1 that is directlyconnected to the computational nodes of the unit. The example process1100 continues to step 1010 of FIG. 10, where the message is received atthe switch node of layer L+1.

In some implementations, the system is initialized (e.g., booted) usingan Ethernet connection from a server. The initialization process canconvey node address and level information if the system's networktopology is specified in a configuration file. In some implementations,the system can detect the network topology autonomously. The system canverify that the actual system matches the specified network topology.

In some implementations, a system can be designed with a hierarchical3-D network topology (e.g., a network topology represented by both thehierarchical tree network 200 and the hierarchical 3-D network 300)using one or more connected semiconductor devices. For example, thesystem can be implemented on multiple programmable logic devices, suchas a field programmable gate array (FPGA) for each node. In someimplementations, each node is implemented with an application specificintegrated circuit (ASIC). In other implementations, each unit ofmultiple nodes (e.g., eight nodes) is implemented with an ASIC,concentrating all the point to point communication links of a unitwithin the ASIC for the unit, providing fast local communication withinthe unit.

In some implementations, one or more nodes of the system include acontroller, a processor, and memory. In some implementations, thecontrollers, the processors, and the memory of multiple nodes (e.g., oneswitch node, acting as a hub, surrounded by eight computational nodes)are integrated on one or more dies of a silicon wafer.

In some implementations, each computational node of the system includesa processor, e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), and communicationhardware, e.g., implemented as a controller. Traffic received on linksfrom other nodes can be passed to a given computational node's processorby the given computational node's communication hardware. Traffic can bemonitored to gather statistics on link conditions usingsoftware-readable registers of the communication hardware. Traffic fromthe given computational node can be sent by the given computationalnode's communication hardware. For example, if the destination of thetraffic is a single point, the given computational node's communicationhardware can route the traffic to another computational node of the sameunit or the switch node connected to the given computational node, asappropriate. If the destination of the traffic is multiple points (e.g.,multicast to a group of nodes), the processor software can use a groupdescriptor to assign links for sending the data, where the links can belinks to other nodes or a link on the broadcast network. The givencomputational node's communication hardware then sends the data on theassigned links. In some implementations, a computational node'scommunication hardware is implemented as an FPGA.

In some implementations, one or more switch nodes of the system includea processor and communication hardware. Traffic received at a givenswitch node can be forwarded by the given switch node's communicationhardware on the appropriate link. Group traffic received at a givenswitch node can be intercepted by the given switch node's processor andforwarded by the given switch node's communication hardware on linksassigned according to a group descriptor.

In some implementations, at a switch node or a computational node, thenode's communication hardware can begin sending a packet once thedestination address is received at the node and before the whole packethas arrived. Including the destination address and size of the packet asthe first two elements of the message header facilitates this process.Since all the communication links can run at the same data rate, thereis no difference between the data arrival rate and the data transmissionrate. The check of the packet can be done upon arrival at thedestination.

A first in, first out (FIFO) data structure can be provided to allowbuffering of a message during times of congestion when the system isclose to being overloaded. The amount of use of the FIFOs can indicateto the distributed OS software that distribution of the applicationneeds to be changed. For instance, if one FIFO is in use for everypacket, then an overuse of a particular link is indicated and the OS cantake action to alleviate the bottleneck. For example, the distributionof the application can be changed dynamically by the OS software.

In some implementations, message packet transfer is performed by acomputational node's processor. This allows data being sent from onenode to another node to be sent directly from the buffer where the datahas been produced, and placed into a buffer where the data is to beutilized, without the switch node processors having to copy the data,thereby improving processing time. That is, the OS software does notcopy the data, which improves efficiency since a software copy requirestwo memory bus accesses—one for read and one for write, and typically,data has to be taken from memory to cache and copied to another cache,which then needs to be flushed. By contrast, the system described hereincan use OS hardware at the node to drop the data into memory. The memorybuffer to receive the data can be pre-selected and ready for receivingthe data. If for any reason, the buffer is not ready, then the OSsoftware can still receive that data, although a copy might be required.In some instances, the application can determine if there is data readyfor the application, and then ask for a pointer to that data rather thanrequesting the OS to copy the data to the application's buffer.

In some implementations, when a packet is scheduled for sending from acomputational node, the application makes a call to the OS to passcontrol of the packet to the OS for sending. In an exampleimplementation, the computational node includes an application processorand an OS processor. The OS is distributed across the whole network andis divided between hardware and software. A message being sent is passedfrom the application to OS stub software running on the applicationprocessor. The packet is then passed to OS hardware on the node, whichis administered by the OS software running on the OS processor. Althoughthis example uses two processors, this is not required. In someimplementations, the OS hardware at the node is designed to interface toa number of processors with FPGAs, and in the above example, thefunctionality is divided between the FPGAs and their on-boardprocessors.

By integrating hardware for packet transfer into a computational node'smemory management hardware, the OS hardware and software can access thedata memory once the application indicates that the packet is ready forsending. The data memory access is processor-transparent, allowing theprocessor to perform other tasks while the OS software sends the packet.In another example implementation, a cache controller is integrated intothe packet hardware, such that the data is sent from or received to thecache memory rather than the main memory. The cache controller is usedto move the data to and from main memory.

A packet transmitted from a source computational node to a destinationcomputational node can pass through one or more intermediate switchnodes. A copy operation is not necessary at intermediate switch nodes,because the intermediate switch node's communication hardware determineson which link to transmit the incoming message based on the destinationaddress field received as the first portion of the message packet. Thisallows the intermediate switch node to begin forwarding the packet onthe determined link without needing to copy the message, as long as thedetermined link is available. In some implementations, a FIFO datastructure is used if the determined link is in use to prevent the packetfrom being lost. By contrast, in conventional networks, complex routing(e.g., using routing tables) is typically required, because multiplemessages may need to be transmitted on a single link. The complexrouting often requires the message to be temporarily copied before thedestination address is decoded from the packet header and the message isforwarded.

When a packet is scheduled to be received at a computational node, theapplication can expect the arriving packet and allocate a data buffer inthe memory of the computational node for the packet. The packet transferhardware (e.g., communication hardware or a controller implemented with,for example, an FPGA, an ASIC, or a silicon die) of the computationalnode can place the packet in the allocated data buffer. If theapplication is not expecting the arriving packet, the OS software canassign a data buffer in the memory of the computational node for thepacket. When the application software makes a call to access the packetdata, the memory management hardware of the computational node can placethe packet in the assigned data buffer for access by the application.

Thus, the packet data does not need to be copied from one memory area toanother, rather the data can be put into the memory without a softwarecopy, thereby reducing latency and improving performance. A memory copyoperation costs two memory accesses per word, i.e., one read access andone write access. The zero copy scheme described herein eliminates thesememory accesses, reducing processing time for packet transfer.Additionally, in a conventional system, the computational node'sprocessor would be unavailable for the duration of a memory copy. Bycontrast, in the system described the computation node remainsavailable. Both of these factors (i.e., memory accesses andunavailability of the processor) in a system with intensive packetsending are major causes of bandwidth loss in the system.

FIG. 12 is a schematic diagram of an example computer system 1200. Thesystem 1200 can be used for performing the actions and methods describedabove. Portions or aspects of a system utilizing a network topologydescribed above can be implemented with one or more elements of theexample computer system 1200. The system 1200 can include a processor1218, a memory 1216, a storage device 1252, and input/output devices1254. Each of the components 1218, 1216, 1252, and 1254 areinterconnected using a system bus 1256. The processor 1218 is capable ofprocessing instructions within the system 1200. These instructions canimplement one or more aspects of the systems, components, and techniquesdescribed above. In some implementations, the processor 1218 is asingle-threaded processor. In other implementations, the processor 1218is a multi-threaded processor. The processor 1218 can include multipleprocessing cores and is capable of processing instructions stored in thememory 1216 or on the storage device 1252 to display graphicalinformation for a user interface on the input/output device 1254.

The memory 1216 is a computer readable medium such as volatile ornon-volatile that stores information within the system 1200. The memory1216 can store processes related to the functionality of networkrouting, for example. The storage device 1252 is capable of providingpersistent storage for the system 1200. The storage device 1252 caninclude a floppy disk device, a hard disk device, an optical diskdevice, or a tape device, or other suitable persistent storage mediums.The storage device 1252 can store the various databases described above.The input/output device 1254 provides input/output operations for thesystem 1200. The input/output device 1254 can include a keyboard, apointing device, and a display unit for displaying graphical userinterfaces.

The computer system shown in FIG. 12 is but one example. In general,embodiments of the subject matter and the operations described in thisspecification can be implemented in digital electronic circuitry, or incomputer software, firmware, or hardware, including the structuresdisclosed in this specification and their structural equivalents, or incombinations of one or more of them. Embodiments of the subject matterdescribed in this specification can be implemented as one or morecomputer programs, i.e., one or more modules of computer programinstructions, encoded on a computer storage media for execution by, orto control the operation of, data processing apparatus. Alternatively orin addition, the program instructions can be encoded in anartificially-generated propagated signal, e.g., a machine-generatedelectrical, optical, or electromagnetic signal, that is generated toencode information for transmission to suitable receiver apparatus forexecution by a data processing apparatus. The computer storage mediumcan be, or be included in, a computer-readable storage device, acomputer-readable storage substrate, a random or serial access memoryarray or device, or a combination of one or more of them.

The term “data processing apparatus” encompasses all apparatus, devices,and machines for processing data, including by way of example aprogrammable processor, a computer, or multiple processors or computers.The apparatus can include, in addition to hardware, code that creates anexecution environment for the computer program in question, e.g., codethat constitutes processor firmware, a protocol stack, a databasemanagement system, an operating system, or a combination of one or moreof them.

A computer program (also known as a program, software, softwareapplication, script, or code) can be written in any form of programminglanguage, including compiled or interpreted languages, or declarative orprocedural languages, and it can be deployed in any form, including as astand alone program or as a module, component, subroutine, or other unitsuitable for use in a computing environment. A computer program does notnecessarily correspond to a file in a file system. A program can bestored in a portion of a file that holds other programs or data (e.g.,one or more scripts stored in a markup language document), in a singlefile dedicated to the program in question, or in multiple coordinatedfiles (e.g., files that store one or more modules, sub programs, orportions of code). A computer program can be deployed to be executed onone computer or on multiple computers that are located at one site ordistributed across multiple sites and interconnected by a communicationnetwork.

The processes and logic flows described in this specification can beperformed by one or more programmable processors executing one or morecomputer programs to perform functions by operating on input data andgenerating output. The processes and logic flows can also be performedby, and apparatus can also be implemented as, special purpose logiccircuitry, e.g., an FPGA or an ASIC.

Processors suitable for the execution of a computer program include, byway of example, both general and special purpose microprocessors, andany one or more processors of any kind of digital computer. Generally, aprocessor will receive instructions and data from a read only memory ora random access memory or both. The essential elements of a computer area processor for performing instructions and one or more memory devicesfor storing instructions and data. Generally, a computer will alsoinclude, or be operatively coupled to receive data from or transfer datato, or both, one or more mass storage devices for storing data, e.g.,magnetic, magneto optical disks, or optical disks. However, a computerneed not have such devices. Moreover, a computer can be embedded inanother device, e.g., a mobile telephone, a personal digital assistant(PDA), a mobile audio or video player, a game console, a GlobalPositioning System (GPS) receiver, to name just a few.

Computer readable media suitable for storing computer programinstructions and data include all forms of non volatile memory, mediaand memory devices, including by way of example semiconductor memorydevices, e.g., EPROM, EEPROM, and flash memory devices; magnetic disks,e.g., internal hard disks or removable disks; magneto optical disks; andCD ROM and DVD-ROM disks. The processor and the memory can besupplemented by, or incorporated in, special purpose logic circuitry.

To provide for interaction with a user, embodiments of the subjectmatter described in this specification can be implemented on a computerhaving a display device, e.g., a CRT (cathode ray tube) or LCD (liquidcrystal display) monitor, for displaying information to the user and akeyboard and a pointing device, e.g., a mouse or a trackball, by whichthe user can provide input to the computer. Other kinds of devices canbe used to provide for interaction with a user as well; for example,feedback provided to the user can be any form of sensory feedback, e.g.,visual feedback, auditory feedback, or tactile feedback; and input fromthe user can be received in any form, including acoustic, speech, ortactile input.

Embodiments of the subject matter described in this specification can beimplemented in a computing system that includes a back end component,e.g., as a data server, or that includes a middleware component, e.g.,an application server, or that includes a front end component, e.g., aclient computer having a graphical user interface or a Web browserthrough which a user can interact with an implementation of the subjectmatter described is this specification, or any combination of one ormore such back end, middleware, or front end components. The componentsof the system can be interconnected by any form or medium of digitaldata communication, e.g., a communication network. Examples ofcommunication networks include a local area network (“LAN”) and a widearea network (“WAN”), e.g., the Internet.

The computing system can include clients and servers. A client andserver are generally remote from each other and typically interactthrough a communication network. The relationship of client and serverarises by virtue of computer programs running on the respectivecomputers and having a client-server relationship to each other.

While this specification contains many specific implementation details,these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of anyinvention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions offeatures that may be specific to particular embodiments of particularinventions. Certain features that are described in this specification inthe context of separate embodiments can also be implemented incombination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features thatare described in the context of a single embodiment can also beimplemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitablesubcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above asacting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, oneor more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excisedfrom the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to asubcombination or variation of a subcombination.

Similarly, while operations are depicted in the drawings in a particularorder, this should not be understood as requiring that such operationsbe performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, orthat all illustrated operations be performed, to achieve desirableresults. In certain circumstances, multitasking and parallel processingmay be advantageous. Moreover, the separation of various systemcomponents in the embodiments described above should not be understoodas requiring such separation in all embodiments, and it should beunderstood that the described program components and systems cangenerally be integrated together in a single software product orpackaged into multiple software products.

A number of embodiments of the invention have been described.Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may bemade without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.Accordingly, other embodiments are within the scope of the followingclaims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A network comprising: a hierarchical structure ofnodes comprising n layers including n−1 layers of switch nodes and 1layer of computational nodes, where n is an integer greater than 1,where each layer in the structure includes one or more units of nodesand where L represents a layer in the structure and is an integer withL=0 representing a lowest layer and L=n−1 representing a highest layerand a number of nodes in a unit is greater than 1; wherein each node ina layer other than the computational layer comprises a switch node for aunit in a next lower layer in the structure and wherein each switch nodeis configured to receive a packet from a first node and transfer thepacket to a second node without copying at the switch node data includedin the packet; and wherein for each unit: each node in the unit isconnected to each other node in the unit by a point to point link; eachnode in the unit is connected to a local switch node for the unit by apoint to point link; and each node in the unit is connected to eachother node in the unit and to the local switch node by a local broadcastnetwork for the unit.
 2. The network of claim 1, wherein one or morepoint to point links included in one or more units are deactivated. 3.The network of claim 1, wherein each unit of a layer in the structurehas the same number of nodes.
 4. The network of claim 1, wherein eachunit of each layer in the structure has the same number of nodes.
 5. Thenetwork of claim 4, wherein each unit comprises a local,three-dimensional network topology represented by a 2×2×2 cube including8 nodes.
 6. The network of claim 4, wherein each computational nodecomprises a processing element operable to perform instructions of oneor more applications.
 7. The network of claim 1, wherein the lowestlayer in the structure is the layer of computational nodes.
 8. Thenetwork of claim 1, wherein each node in the unit is connected to eachother node in the unit and to the local switch node by an Ethernetnetwork.
 9. The network of claim 1, wherein each computational nodecomprises a processing element, a controller, and memory.
 10. Thenetwork of claim 1, wherein each computational node comprisescommunication hardware implemented as a field programmable gate array.